NSG 512 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Systematic Review Critique
Systematic reviews are the pillars of evidence-based health care and
are secondary research, which is the development of a study based
upon prior research. Researchers compile studies into one review and
conduct a thorough analysis of an issue. These reviews allow
researchers to judge the quality of studies and make suggestions after
replicating the research methods used. This method of research is
popular in the health care industry because it identifies solutions to
complex issues, increases accuracy, and resolves discrepancies.
Read the open-access article assigned to your team using the link
provided in the Ch. 29 toolkit.
- Atlantis, E., Fahey, P., & Foster, J. (2014). Collaborative care for
comorbid depression and diabetes: A systematic review and metaanalysis.
BMJ Open, 4, e004706.
- Bridges, J., Nicholson, C., Maben, J., Pope, C., Flatley, M.,
Wilkinson, C., ... Tziggili, M. (2013). Capacity for care: Metaethnography
of acute care nurses' experiences of the nurse-patient
relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 760-772.
- Li, Z. Z., Li, Y., Lei, X., Zhang, D., Liu, L., Tang, S., & Chen, L.
(2014). Prevalence of suicidal ideation in Chinese college students: A
meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9, e104368.
Utilize the resources in the Chapter 29 Systematic Reviews of
Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Meta-synthesis, and Mixed Studies
Review toolkit as a guide to completing your systematic review critique.
Box 29.1 in the toolkit provides critiquing guidelines.
Prepare an 8- to 12-slide presentation using Microsoft® PowerPoint® or
a presentation tool of your choice summarizing your findings.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your team's presentation
SupportingMaterial:Resource Manual for Nursing Research
Linked Objectives: 1.3
Questions & Answers
Have a Question?
Be the first to ask a question about this.